|
CUERVOBRILLANTE (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Surprise, surprise! - This odd entity has now currently decided the 9/11 "theory" is NOT even "plausible" after all, either, as it previously stated, just hours ago!I am now invited to get off my second-grader "high horse" LOL! It would "gladly" admit it was wrong, it says, if the day comes; yet in the same breath; "can't buy into it"! Glad-rags or Sackcloth; which would be more appropriate for such an utter, crass blindness IF the scales get pulled off from those unseeing, dim eyes eventually?
pheil58 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"acceptable:worthy of approval or praise:fair-showing:...as a theory NO not plausable...Get off you high horse CUERVO....My position is this:...Bush is an imbecile..Iraq a horrific mistake....but until I see poof that our government planned ..staged ... and carried aout an operation to blow up the towers ..wtc7...and the Petagon....I just can't buy into it....and by the way, I'm all for an independent investigation...If they find proof then I will gladly admit I have been wrong...
CUERVOBRILLANTE (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Chambers's Twentieth Century dictionary:
PLAUSIBLE:
"acceptable:worthy of approval or praise:fair-showing: specious: ingratiating and fair-spoken"
... IS that word "plausible" therefore REALLY applicable to the 9/11 "theory" according to our 'erudite' poster's mindset, or isn't it?? ... Is his proud erudition getting eroded from a mere second-grader perhaps? hehehe! LOL!
CUERVOBRILLANTE (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
CAN or CANNOT this schizophrenic poster ... as 'erudite' as he pretends to be ... REALLY LIVE WITH THE IDEA THAT "HIGHER UPS" KNEW AND LET 9/11 HAPPEN?
Maybe a psychiatrist might come forward to explain the foibles of this 'illness' !!
CUERVOBRILLANTE (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I now see: What WAS " ... some higher ups knew and let it happen I can live with ... " (A day ago) Now becomes today, 3rd December:
"Not once did I say it was acceptable... ... as a theory ... it is plausible ... "
AGAIN:
"Some higher ups knew and let it happen I can live with" ... our 'erudite' poster now has a change of heart and tells us he could NOT live with that and it would be UNACCEPTABLE! ... Do make your mind up once and for all, P+L+E+A+S+E!
pheil58 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"We are to understand; It's 'acceptable' a man can watch another raping a child, but "just "CANNOT be accused of the actual crime! Such is the schizophrenic argument it seems from a certain 'erudite' poster who finds it acceptable that 9/11 was let to happen by "higher-ups" and can live with THAT"
Not once did I say it was acceptible thats absurd....as a theory..It is plausable...although I have seen no proof....CD, no-planes...fake phone-calls ect....idioiotic based on the evidence...
CUERVOBRILLANTE (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It is the SALOMON BROTHERS BUILDING; WTC7, which is seen behind Jane Standley's head. - The skyscraper; the hub of the WTC, which is being spoken about principally; turned entirely into talcum powder in seconds; with no plane hitting it at all! (Just fires on two floors) THE TOTAL COLLAPSE BEING SPOKEN ABOUT, LIVE, TWENTY-THREE MINUTES BEFORE IT ACTUALLY HAPPENS! (The Marriott Hotel did not collapse in this way at all)
Imagine if the opportune 'break in transmission' to London had not occurred!
zing10101 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the reporter says the Mariot hotal has collapsed. But you can clearly see it behind her still standing
CUERVOBRILLANTE (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
We are to understand; It's 'acceptable' a man can watch another raping a child, but just CANNOT be accused of the actual crime! Such is the schizophrenic argument it seems from a certain 'erudite' poster who finds it acceptable that 9/11 was let to happen by "higher-ups" and can live with THAT, as a kind of lesser crime - yet just cannot accept the heinous crime of those who took the active part by proxy or whatever!
SOMETHING HERE JUST DOES NOT ADD UP AT ALL!
Would somebody like to correct me?
GARY171064 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Cap
'Get a book' you say-what, one that millions of people accept as fact so it MUST be true.
How about 'The Bible' OR an even bigger work of fiction for the masses 'The 9/11 comission'
Last book I read was very informative and factual-it was called 'A New Pearl Harbour'
Plenty of evidenve to support the official story of 9/11 being 'staged'...
The Ice Age was 'invented' as an alternative theory to the biblical flood.
It's no good buying a book if your mind is too locked to read read. |
