brian78045 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Theres an interesting article on Flight 93 at DNotice (org) titled "One Of Our Aircraft Isn't Missing". It has some new research.

brian78045 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

...Federal and local agencies would also be immediately informed of the downed aircraft, and its location. If AP had happened to call UAL after 0903, then AP would also have been informed.

brian78045 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

cchris 874 says, "As mentioned, what really matters is not when UA knew about flight 175, but when it made the information public." When an aircraft is confirmed as crashed it is not kept secret by the airlines! It is released immediately to the authorities and the press! As Boston Center's Colin Scoggins affirms, UAL confirmed the crash 2 to 3 minutes after the crash....

brian78045 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

cchris says, "A landing of Flight 93 in CLE can only be established through direct evidence. To date, no witness is on record as seeing it there, nor was it on the landing records obtained by Devvy Kidd." As I told you, Flight 93 landed under another identity.

brian78045 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

cchris874 says, "I did. What the link to United Visual doesn't indicate is how United's operation center would have known where flight 175 had been after about 8:47am, the time its transponder was turned off, and then changed twice." Flight 175's transponder was never turned off. It was changed twice. As long as it is still transmitting a signal, UAL and ATC were picking up its secondary radar signal. Changing the transponder code does not negate the signal, just the code!

jmh423 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

ccrris-"You are being taken for a ride. As proof, I ask you to find any published serial #s of aircraft structures (i.e. exluding engines/black boxes) for the following crashes: Comair flight 191 (2006); American flight 1420 (1999); PSA flight 1771 (1987)" So your answer is that you can not find one credible source that will ID the engine on Murray St. as a P&W JTD8? Of course not as the engine is a CFM56. Engine serial#s were posted for all the crashes you mentioned. "taken for a ride"...LOL

j400wel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i see bodies and they are all walking around. cchris according to the 911 report u are barking up the wrong tree! stay off the luppyjuice u shill.

911insidejob81 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

wtc7 collapsed in 11.september at 5:20 pm. It looked like controlled demolition! And it was!!!! If it was controlled demolition than they knew about 9/11 before it took place. It takes days to plan and prepare for controlled demolition. ( not 8 hours)

jmh423 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Google:"Common Sense Common Ground", by Colonel George Nelson Google:"The Rest Of The Murray Street Engine Story" Can you find ONE credible aeronautical engineer, or designer who will ID the Murray Street Engine as the PW JTD8 that was standard equipment on UA 175? Pratt Whitney won't own it...Do you dispute Colonel Nelsons conclusion & if so on what basis? Can you name any credible person who has refuted Nelson's assessment? Inside Job!! Zelikow Report=BULLSHIT!!

cchris874 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

cont'd. . . As mentioned, what really matters is not when UA knew about flight 175, but when it made the information public. Unless you can find a press report dated before 9:28am on 9/11 where United gave confirmation of flight 175, your case is theoretical and cannot be treated as unassailable fact. A landing of Flight 93 in CLE can only be established through direct evidence. To date, no witness is on record as seeing it there, nor was it on the landing records obtained by Devvy Kidd.